It started a couple of thousand years ago
when some Jewish people decided that God regards only them as his chosen race. Jews became god's special race while all other races were deemed inferior because they would never win his divine favour.
the basic principles of that religion, Judaism is exclusively for the Jews.

It is next to impossible for a non-Jew to be admitted into the Judaic religion. It is as difficult for non-Jews to become a member of Judaism as it is for them to become a Jew. In other words, Judaism is a Jews-only religion. For millennia this sense of divine specialness, exclusiveness, chosenness has percolated throughout Jewish culture.

Putting aside the religious aspect of this belief, what the message boils down to is that only Jews matter, only Jews are important, all other races are inferior.

The modern manifestation of the Jewish tradition of specialness was the violent creation of a Jews-only state in Palestine. To Jews, God has given the land of Israel to the Jews and the presence of non-Jews on this sacred Judaic soil is sacrilegious.

Despite the fact that there are many Palestinians with Israeli citizenship, the Zionist state is a Jews-only state because only Jews have full rights. Palestinian Israelis have the right to vote in Zionist elections, contest for seats in the Knesset, and even become members of the Jewish parliament but they do not have the same legal rights as Jews - which surely indicates the relative insignificance of democracy to Jews.

"The tours (of Palestinian and Bedouin areas inside Israel) proved to be a dramatic illustration of the discrimination and racism inherent in a system designed specifically to maintain a Jewish majority - a system based on the superiority of Jews over anyone else. Palestinians, including Bedouin, living inside Israel are citizens of the state. They can vote in Israeli elections; Bedouin, although not other Palestinians, serve in the Israeli military. As a matter of law and of the institutional arrangements inherent in Israel's status as a Jewish-majority state, however, Palestinians and Bedouin, because they are non-Jews, do not receive anything like equal rights or services from the state. Not only do they face the kind of de facto discrimination that blacks have faced in the U.S. - their schools are inadequate, their municipal services are inadequate, they face job discrimination, their towns often sit next to toxic waste dumps and other environmentally hazardous sites - but because Israel is explicitly a Jewish state, Palestinians are unable by law to enjoy the benefits of the state provided to Jews or in any way to live in the state as Jews do." (Kathleen & Bill Christison '"Finally It Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from Palestine'.

Palestinian Israelis are second class citizens - and if many Jews had a choice about the matter they would deport these indigenous 'aliens' if they could get away with it.

Paradoxically, in order to win the sympathies of people in the western world, Jews try to hide the second class citizenship of Israeli Palestinians from the outside world as much as they try to hide their goal of a Jews-only state. Whilst pretending to western audiences that the Zionist state is a Western, secular, multicultural society like all other Western states, Zionists are doing their utmost to remove all palestinians from their own country. The more they try to make conditions for the Palestinians unlivable, the more that Zionists cover up such ethnic cleansing with the deception that the Zionist state is just like any other Western state. There are Jews in the Western world who pretend to be anti-Zionist in order to surreptitiously put forward arguments in favour of the Zionist state in Palestine. They do this by suggesting that in the Zionist state the Palestinians are treated just the same as Jews. Such Jews invariably expose their pro-Zionist stance when they claim that Jews and palestinians are equal.

The Jews-only nature of the Zionist state is manifest from Zionists' attempts to completely eradicate all signs of Palestinian life and culture in Palestine. The Zionist military terrorizes Palestinian civilians and those it does not kill are driven from their homes and villages and, sometimes, even out of the country. The Zionists demolish the villages to make sure that the Palestinians can never return. They then wipe out all traces of Palestinians' existance in the land - much as the Nazis tried to obliterate the existence of Jews in what Hannah ardent called 'the holes of oblivion'. The Zionists then build Jews-only settlements in their place, "Moshe Dayan, former Defense Minister, stated in a famous speech before students at the Israeli Institute of Technology in Haifa in 1969: "Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages.

You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahial arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." (Ha'aretz, April 4, 1969, quoted in Davis, 21). (Noel Ignatiev 'Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine' counterpunch.

Another example of Jewish specialness or uniqueness is that the Jews-only state in Palestine is the only country in the world which refuses to define its own borders. It refuses to do this because it supports Zionist expansionism and doesn't want to curb its colonialist ambitions with specific boundaries, "Israel is unique in that it doesn't have defined or recognized borders ... Israel has always been a country with creeping borders - it has an insatiable urge to expand, and thus further dispossess the native population. On May 14, 1948, the day he proclaimed the new state without specifying its borders, Ben Gurion wrote in his diary: "Take the American Declaration of Independence for instance. It contains no mention of the territorial limits" A few years later, Ben-Gurion wrote: "To maintain the status quo will not do. We have to set up a dynamic state bent upon expansion" The current construction of the land-grab wall is
merely the latest manifestation of these expansionist proclivities." (Paul de Rooij 'Straw Men and Wild Fires'.

"In 1948, the Jewish colony became a state but with ever expanding borders. Israel launched six major wars against the Palestinian people and the neighboring Arab states. These were launched in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1978, 1982, and 2002. In all these wars, Israel expanded its borders. In 1948, it annexed the Galilee, Auja area, and the Jerusalem corridor, which were Palestinian territories according to the 1947 UN Partition Resolution 181. In 1956, Israel collaborated with the imperialist European powers of Britain and France in invading Egypt and the Palestinian territory of Gaza Strip. Only a firm stand from President Eisenhower forced the Zionist Israelis to withdraw from Gaza Strip and Sinai. In 1967, Israel invaded and occupied the Arab territories of Sinai, Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights. In 1978, Israel invaded and occupied South Lebanon. Then, it invaded Lebanon, including its capital, Beirut, in 1982. When it withdrew, few months later, it expanded its occupation of South Lebanon. In addition to these wars, Israel launched major air raids on Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, and Tunisia." (Hassan A. El-Najjar 'Zionism: The Highest Stage of Imperialism'

Palestinians' political rights in the Jews-only state are also infringed since they are not allowed to form political parties which advocate a multi-cultural state in which the Palestinians and Jews share power, "Unlike many countries, including the United States, the Israeli state does not belong, even in principle, to those who reside within its borders, but is defined as the state of the Jewish people, wherever they may be. That peculiar definition is one reason why the state has to this day failed to produce a written constitution, define its borders, or even declare the existence of an Israeli nationality. Moreover, in this "outpost of democracy," no party that opposes the existence of the Jewish state is permitted to take part in elections. It is as if the United States were to declare itself a Christian state, define "Christian" not by religious belief but by descent, and then pass a "gag law" prohibiting public discussion of the issue." (Noel Ignatiev 'Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine' counterpunch.

The Jews-only state also implements Jews-only employment policies, "Israel plans to terminate employment opportunities for Palestinians by 2008.

Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya'alon said Israel no longer maintains a policy of encouraging Palestinian employment. Ya'alon said the government has been phasing out the number of jobs available to Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip in Israel. By 2008, Israel would institute a complete ban on the employment of Palestinians, Middle East Newsline reported. The government can ban Palestinians from entering Israel and requires entry and work permits. "The goal is to stop Palestinians from working in Israel by 2008," Ya'alon told the Low-Intensity Conflict warfare counter-terrorism [LIC-2005] conference on Tuesday. Ya'alon said Israel has been encouraging Western and other donor nations to help the Palestinian Authority create jobs in an effort to end its dependence on the Jewish state. He said the new policy no longer regards a peace agreement with the PA as resulting in security." (Israel to ban hiring of Palestinians' WORLD TRIBUNE.COM March 10, 2005).

Another Jews-only policy implemented by the Jews-only state in Palestine concerns land ownership. "The state owns 94 percent of Israel's land and holds it in trust specifically for the Jewish people, meaning that Palestinians cannot buy land - even land they once owned before Israel was created and they were dispossessed. They usually cannot even rent state land." (Kathleen & Bill Christison '"Finally It Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from Palestine'

Palestinian Israelis who have the right to vote and sit in the Knesset do not have the right to buy land because the Jews-only God has given Palestinian land exclusively to Jews. The Jews-only state even deprives Palestinian Israelis of the land they own, "Israel has nationalized some 93 per cent of the country's lands, by appropriating land without compensation from the four million Palestinian refugees who live in exile and by confiscating the lands of the one million Palestinians who live as citizens. This 93 per cent of Israel is out of bounds to Palestinians like Ali." (Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada, 'Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside Israel'

The way that Jews steal land from the Palestinian- Israelis who own land is through the Jews-only planning system. The following incident is about a Palestinian- Israeli
called Ali living in a Palestinian village called sakhin who is trying to build an extension to his house on his own land, "But even so, couldn't Ali at least find a legal way to build a house inside a Palestinian community or inside Sakhin? The problem again is the law. In 1965, the government passed the Planning and Building Law, which defined all the places in which Israeli citizens, Jews and Palestinians, could live. Every community's room for expansion was circumscribed on a map of the country in the form of a blue line marked around it. Anywhere inside the blue line could be developed, anywhere outside the blue line could not. In the case of Jewish communities, the blue lines were drawn generously to allow for future expansion.

The state has also been adding new Jewish communities to its list ever since 1965. In Palestinian communities, by contrast, the blue lines were drawn tightly around the houses that already existed in 1965, leaving no room for expansion. (In fact, Israel refused to draw blue lines around dozens of Palestinian communities that had existed before the creation of Israel, thereby "uncrating" them. Today some 100,000 Palestinians live in these "unrecognized villages". In law all the homes in unrecognized villages are considered illegal and subject to demolition). Since 1965, no new Palestinian communities have been approved." (Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada, 'Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside Israel'

Some Zionists have become politically embarrassed about such racism. But what they are embarrassed about is not the racism but the perception of racism by the rest of the world. So Jews are currently seeking ways to camouflage this racism to win the approval of the anti-racist values of the Western world, "the Jewish National Fund" maintains and implements Israel's discriminatory land policies. Two weeks ago, Israel's attorney general determined that all land managed by the Israel Lands Administration, including land owned by the Jewish National Fund, must be marketed without discrimination or limits including to non-Jews. According to the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, "The state prosecutor's office believes it will not be able to defend before the High Court the policy of allocating Jewish National Fund land to Jews only."

Days later, news agencies reported, " The Jewish National Fund and the Finance Ministry are discussing ways to separate the JNF from the state, to allow it to continue selling land to Jews only."" ('QUIT! premieres latest line of "Estee Slaughter" products on Valentine's Day'.

The Jews-only anxieties about the anti-racist views of Westerners might be misplaced given that the Western world's support to the Zionist state to such an extent that many Western governments are now as racist as the Jews-only state.

The Jews-only state also insists that whilst Christians are allowed to visit holy Christian sites in Palestine, it is not willing to allow them to immigrate and become Israeli citizens - especially, of course, if they are Palestinian Christians. Any Jew around the world is legally entitled to immigrate to Palestine and become an Israeli citizen but not
Christians because this is a Jews-only state. Of course, all states around the world have the right to control immigration but the Jews-only state allows immigration only from Jews not any other religion. In other words, the Jews-only state promotes a racist, Jews-only, immigration policy.

The Jews-only state in Palestine tries to purify its Jewish essence through the construction of Jews-only roads.

"Israel has established a 300-mile road network throughout the West Bank connecting the settlements. These are high-security roads-three football fields wide with their surrounding security perimeters - and they are accessible only to Israelis. They separate Palestinian population areas from each other and from their agricultural land; in fact, before the current warfare, they segmented the areas of semi-autonomous Palestinian control into 227 separate, non-contiguous patches of land." (Kathleen Christison 'Before There Was Terrorism')

The concept of Jews-only roads should not be entirely surprising since Jews have also created jJews-only settlements, villages, towns, and cities, "They (palestinians) are not permitted, by law, to move into Jewish cities or the Jewish neighborhoods of mixed cities. (Kathleen & Bill Christison '"Finally It Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from Palestine'

"small luxury Jewish communities known in Hebrew as "mitzpim". These mitzpim, which have extensive lands on which their inhabitants can build, are required by law to vet anyone who wishes to live inside them. Again by law, non-Jews are not entitled to apply to join these communities." (Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada, 'Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside Israel' )

So, although Palestinian-Israelis are technically allowed to travel on these roads in practice this is not possible because the roads link one Jews-only settlement/town/city to another.

There are also Jews-only cemeteries alongside the Jews-only roads running between Jews-only settlements/towns/cities, in the Jews-only state. Jews loathe the idea of being laid to rest in the company of non-Jews - as if even in death non-Jews might contaminate or poison their Jewish essence. As Israel shamir has pointed out, "Their separate burial is necessary to guarantee their bodily resurrection when the Messiah comes. A Jewish body defiled by gentile proximity won't be resurrected, according to the Jews. Even irreligious Jews follow this separation rule without giving it a second thought." If non-Jews are accidentally buried amongst Jews this puts all the Jews at resurrectional risk so they have to be dug up and transferred to a non-Jewish cemetery, "This squeamish attitude is particularly unpleasant: whenever the Jews discover that a person of doubtful Jewishness is buried among their lot they remove the body and dump it elsewhere. It happened to an Israeli citizen Teresa Angelowitz. She was buried in the Jewish cemetery; later on the religious authorities discovered that she was a wife of a Jew, but not a Jew. They exhumed her body at the dark of the night and re-buried on the dumping ground. It happened to many Russian soldiers who died defending the Jewish character of Israel and were refused the burial."

Many Jews in the Jews-only state were horrified by the tsunami which hit South-East Asia in December 2004. They were horrified by the idea that jewish victims might end up being buried with the tens of thousands of goy victims, "While the whole world had sent aid to the tsunami-hit South East Asia, Israel forwarded a team entrusted with a unique task. Not many Israeli tourists were swept away by the giant waves - official death toll stands at three, with some twenty missing; not many comparing with the hundred thousand Indonesians or even with three thousand Swedes. Still the Israeli teams were very active on the ground. The highly trained experts led by Rabbi Meshi Zahav did not go to save trapped survivors or alleviate suffering of millions; their job was to save dead Jews from fate worse than death - that is to be buried with the goyim in the same grave.

The Haaretz daily reported: "The Israeli rescue teams in Thailand split up Thursday: one team worked on identifying bodies in Krabi, while another worked on the same task in Phuket. The Israeli crews - from the police and Zaka (a non-profit group that specializes in identifying victims of disasters) - are trying to locate dead Israelis before they are buried". They pressed upon the Thai government to postpone the mass entombment, though it was necessary to prevent the spread of epidemics; and Bangkok gave in. Every dead Jewish body should be taken to Israel, or at least buried separately from impure non-Jews. Witty Gilad Atzmon remarked: "the 'altruistic' Jews are in a state of panic, as we all know, dead Jews are precious, they deserve a special burial. The fact that 5-10 Jews might be lost forever among some other 125.000 gentiles is pretty horrifying, I am sure you can see it."" (Israel Shamir 'Tsunami in Gaza' January 2nd 2005).

In the Jews-only state, with its jews-only cemeteries, jews-only land, and jews-only roads running between jews-only settlements/towns/cities, it is absolutely imperative that, in death, every part of a jew's body is buried in a jews-only cemetery, "A week after the Likud referendum, two terrible blows were delivered. An armored vehicle carrying a large quantity of explosives entered Gaza city in order to blow up buildings, and was hit by a roadside bomb planted by Palestinian fighters. It exploded, tearing the six soldiers to pieces. The day after, the very same thing happened on the "Philadelphi Axis": an armored personnel carrier full of explosives, which was sent there to blow up tunnels under the border, was hit by a Palestinian rocket and blew up with its five crew members.

The power of each of the two explosions was such that body parts were scattered over hundreds of meters. The whole country saw on TV how Israeli soldiers crawled on all fours, filtering the sand with their bare hands in order to gather the body parts of their comrades. The media competed in the orchestration of a necrophile hysteria, with endless talk about "body parts" interlaced with scenes of funerals. (Uri Avnery 'Busharon: The Countdown' May 15th, 2004). There is no intention here of mocking Zionists' death rituals. All cultures have their own rituals concerning the burial of the dead and each must be given the same respect. However, the respect that I afforded this ritual unexpectedly blew up in my face a few months later when I read an article in which the commentator made an aside that Zionist state refuses to return what is left of the bodies of human bombers to their families.

"When Michael Matza, the Inquirer's Jerusalem correspondent, wrote a story headlined "Palestinians' Remains Fuel a Bitterness," which detailed Israel's practice of not releasing the bodies of human bombers, it provoked a hue and cry from readers who felt the piece was too sympathetic to families of the bombers. It didn't matter that Matza had written numerous pieces sympathetic to Israeli victims of "suicide" attacks. He was denounced as anti-Semitic and labeled a "self-hating Jew," a favorite epithet for Jewish journalists." (Barbara Matusow 'Caught in the Crossfire' American Journalism Review June/July 2004 issue). The Zionists show their utter contempt for palestinians by doing the exact opposite of what is demanded of them by their own death rituals. This is part of Zionists' cultural terrorism against the Palestinians.

There is a lot of 'Jews-only' racism in the Jews-only state. There are, of course, racists in every society and there are even some in Western governments, but these days if Western politicians were to make a racist statement in public they would immediately be attacked by their countries' Zionist lobby and, if they didn't resign, they would be sacked forthwith. Not so in the Jewish state. Jewish politicians can make openly racist statements without anyone bothering to condemn them. "An Israeli cabinet minister has called for the expulsion of some 1.3 million Palestinian citizens of Israel who constitute nearly one fifth of the state's population.

Transportation Minister Avigdor Lieberman said during an interview with the Israeli army radio (Gali Tzahal) on Sunday that the "Arabs of Israel" should be expelled in case a Palestinian state was established and Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip were dismantled. Lieberman, a former Moldovan immigrant, who arrived in Israel in 1978, suggested that the existence of a large non-Jewish minority in Israel threatened the "Jewish identity" and "ethnic purity" of Israel. But his explicitly racist remarks raised no ire in the Israeli political establishment. Israeli officials, from Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon downward, refused to condemn the remarks, suggesting a sympathy with Lieberman's ideas.

Lieberman's racism has been well known for many years. A few years ago, he called for the bombing of the Aswan Dam in Egypt, the Presidential palace in Damascus and Iran's nuclear facilities. He also called for executing Arab Knesset members Tibi and Mohamed Baraka by a firing squad for supporting the Palestinians rights and calling for ending the Israeli occupation. In 2002, he urged the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to carry out "wholesale killings" of Palestinian civilians in order to force them to flee to Jordan and other neighbouring Arab countries." ('Israeli Minister Wants Total Palestinian-Arab 'Cleansing''

"Recently, a law was passed in one of the Israeli Knesset's many committees saying that settlers who will be evacuated following a future retreat from the Gaza Strip will be given compensation. There was a minimal majority of one committee member for this law, which is an essential part of Prime Minister's Ariel Sharon's plan of "Gaza Disengagement", and in order for it to be passed the balance was tipped to the side of the government from outside the coalition by Member of Knesset Mohammad Barake. Barake, a MK from "Hadash" party (the former communist party) is, as his name might indicate, an Israeli Arab. Limor Livnat, the Israeli minister of education, who had also voted in favor of the law, was one of the most noticeable politicians in a group of right wing Knesset members and others who had each expressed outrage that an Arab (who had, like any other Member of the Knesset, been elected democratically) was the one to determine the future of Israel in such an important question.

Because of Livnat's high position in the government, there was a mini uproar in the Israeli media about the fact that the minister of education, the person who is in charge of what children will be taught in schools, had said something so bluntly racist. In actuality, no one was surprised. No one has any illusions that Ariel Sharon and the rest of the ministers besides - maybe - politicians from the Labor Party, think any differently from Livnat, in spite of them remaining more or less silent about the subject. In any normal "western" democracy such a thing would have become an immediate scandal. I can only imagine that if Germany's education minister would say something even remotely close to Livnat's statement about a Jewish parliament member, the only question would be whether that minister would find him or herself out of a job more quickly than it would take the foreign minister of Israel to file an official protest." (Uri Yaakobi 'Limor Livnat and the Palestinian "problem"'

Perhaps there ought to be a Zionist lobby in the Zionist state to keep Zionist politicians on the straight and narrow.

The Jews-only policy does not, as yet, extend to stopping Jews from marrying non-Jews - it just makes it impossible for them to live together. "A new law passed by the Israeli parliament on 31 July 2003 bars family unification for Israelis who are married to Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. The Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law explicitly discriminates against Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip. It also implicitly discriminates against Palestinian citizens of Israel, who constitute some 20% of the Israeli population, and against Palestinian residents of Jerusalem, for it is they who usually marry Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. As such, the law formally institutionalizes a form of racial discrimination based on ethnicity or nationality.

The UN Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination has expressed concern about this new law and has called on Israel to revoke it and reconsider its policy with a view to facilitating family unification on a non-discriminatory basis. The UN Human Rights Committee has likewise called on Israel to revoke the law and to reconsider its policy with a view to facilitating family unification of all citizens and permanent residents. Not being able to obtain family unification for their Palestinian spouses leaves thousands of Palestinian citizens of Israel and Jerusalem residents with two options: having their spouse live with them illegally or moving to the West Bank and Gaza Strip, where they would be living under Israeli military occupation, in a situation of conflict and facing daily incursions by the Israeli army, bombardments, house demolition, curfews and hundreds of checkpoints, which make it extremely difficult to move, work or carry out ordinary daily activities. In addition, it is illegal for Israelis and Jerusalemites to enter the Occupied Territories and those married to residents of the Occupied Territories may only do so in special circumstances and subject to permits and stringent restrictions."

In july 2004, the Jews-only state renewed the law to encourage Jews-only marriages, "Also Sunday, the Israeli Cabinet extended for six months a rule forbidding Palestinians who marry Israelis from living in Israel. Human rights groups have criticized the law. Arabs make up about 20 percent of the country's population, and many Israelis are concerned about their growing numbers." (Ibrahim Barzak 'Palestinian Authority Offices Burned Down' Guardian

Jews-only prerogatives exist on the international level as much as they do on the domestic level. The main Jews-only international law is that the Jews-only state does not have to abide by United Nations'resolutions. There are varying estimates as to how many UN resolutions are being flouted by the Jews-only state. But worse than the refusal to live up to these resolutions is the refusal of the Western world to insist that the Jews-only state live up to its international obligations. Throughout the 1990s the American and British governments made incessant demands for Saddam Hussein to abide by UN resolutions but they never once demanded that the Zionist state in Palestine do the same thing.

Both governments also made incessant demands for Saddam Hussein to abolish his non-existent weapons of mass destruction but never demanded the Zionist state in Palestine gets rid of its very real weapons of mass destruction. Even worse than the Western world's obliviousness to the Zionist state's indifference to the UN resolutions is that the only countries which the Western world insists must abide by the UN resolutions are the enemies of the Jews-only state.

The people of the Jews-only book refuse to live by man made laws; they will abide only by laws handed down to them by their Jews-only god.

These are not the only Jews-only international laws, "On December 13, 2004 the EU General Affairs and External Relations Council approved the EU-Israel Action Plan as part of the EU's New Neighborhood Policy - one step below full membership in the EU.

According to the released EU-Israel Action Plan: "The EU and Israel are now closer together than ever before and, as near neighbours, will reinforce their political and economic interdependence. Enlargement offers the opportunity for the EU and Israel to develop an increasingly close relationship, going beyond co-operation, to involve a significant measure of economic integration and a deepening of political co-operation." Despite European declarative positions affirming Israel's obligations in international law, and dismissing Israel's rejection of them, and despite Israel's shocking human rights record, the EU-Israel Action Plan states that the "EU and Israel share the common values of democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law and basic freedoms."

Worse, the EU-Israel Action Plan might even lead to Israel deciding on EU policies themselves. It stated "the possibility for Israel to participate progressively in key aspects of EU policies and programmes." It provides "an upgrade in the scope and intensity of political co-operation." Concrete steps include that the "EU will continue its efforts to ensure that the condemnation of anti-Semitism will become a part of international norms through, inter alia, appropriate UN resolutions."

Considering Israel's policy to equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israeli state practices vis-a-vis Palestinian civilians, this has meant that the EU will censure itself when it comes to address Israeli violations of human rights. The EU-Israel Action Plan formalised the facilitation of Israel's violations of human rights and international humanitarian law by shielding Israel from legal and political accountability, and by helping it escape the normal penalties or costs that would result ordinarily from the violations." (Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, 'In bed with Israel: EU's close relationship with Israel supports abuse' )

There are also what might be called Jews-only fantasies. Perhaps the most well known is that prior to the second world war, when Jews were thinking about moving to Palestine, they were told nobody was living there, "Israel Zangwill's 1901 assertion that "Palestine is a country without a people; the Jews are a people without a country". It hopes to create a land entirely empty of gentiles, an Arabia deserta in which Jewish children can laugh and play throughout a wasteland called peace." (Michael Neumann 'What is Antisemitism?'

Other Jews-only fantasies are that when the Jews got to Palestine the Palestinians left of their own accord whilst making the threat that the Jews should be driven into the sea, "On 11 October 1961 Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion declared in the Israeli Knesset: 'The Arabs' exit from Palestine...began immediately after the UN resolution, from the areas earmarked for the Jewish state. And we have explicit documents testifying that they left Palestine following instructions by the Arab leaders, with the Mufti at their head, under the assumption that the invasion of the Arab armies at the expiration of the Mandate will destroy the Jewish state and push all the Jews into the sea, dead or alive'. The phrase "push all the Jews into the sea, dead or alive" has acquired a life of its own as it is invoked by Zionist supporters on a daily basis in order to justify the aggressive policies of Israel as well as its recalcitrance in continuing the occupation of the Palestinians of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem.

It is a highly emotive phrase invoking images of the Holocaust, though adapted to a Mediterranean setting. Mr Ben Gurion gives no attribution for this phrase, nor does he claim that it is a quote from an Arab source. It is expressed here as if it is his personal surmise as to the Arab army's intentions. The phrase has been variously attributed by Zionist supporters to Yasser Arafat, Gamel Abdul Nasser, or any other of Israel's enemies, but none whom I have challenged, including U.S. Congressman Henry Waxman, who made the claim in a letter to me, atributing the phrase to Nasser, have been able to provide any documentation of support for their claim.

The speech by Mr. Ben Gurion appears to be the origin of the phrase. The phrase, thus, has a Jewish origin and not an Arab origin. Mr Ben Gurion is the originator of the phrase, in all likelihood. (As regards the idea of Arab leaders telling Palestinians to leave). Mr. Ben Gurion's first claim that the Arab exodus from Palestine was provoked by directives from the leaders of the surrounding Arab states has been shown by overwhelming historical research to be false." (William Martin 'Who is Pushing Whom into the Sea?'

It has to be wondered, how much further this trend will go in the future? In America, the zionists have created a political taboo against criticisms of the Zionist state.

"Although criticism of specific Israeli policies is permissible in the United States, it is more or less forbidden to express fundamental criticism of the Zionist state, of America's basic policy of support for Israel, or of the Jewish-Zionist grip on the U.S. media or America's political and academic life. (Remarkably, this is in contrast to the situation in Israel itself, where Jews and even Arab citizens of the Zionist state have much greater freedom than Americans publicly to criticize Zionism and Israeli policies.) Prominent persons who dare to violate this prohibition are immediately castigated as "anti-Semitic" (that is, anti-Jewish), and pay a heavy price in damage to their reputations or careers.

Politicians who publicly speak out against America's support for Zionism risk almost certain political ruin. Among the political or governmental figures whose careers were destroyed because they violated the powerful taboo have been U.S. Senators William Fulbright, Adlai Stevenson III, and Charles Percy, Congressmen Paul McCloskey and Paul Findley, and Deputy Secretary of State George Ball." (Abdullah Mohamed Sindi 'How the Jewish-Zionist Grip on American Film and Television Promotes Bias Against Arabs and Muslims' Institute for Historical Review

However, this taboo is not enough for the Zionists.

They want to pass legislation which equates criticism of the Zionist state in Palestine with anti-semitism and outlaws anti-semitism - thereby making criticism of the Zionist state in palestine illegal. There is no other people around the world who insist that their government should be protected against all criticisms. What such Zionist legislation in America will do is to create the only state in the world which is beyond criticism even though it is the most racist society on Earth.

In America, the Zionist domination of the media is so great that it is almost on the verge of becoming a 'Jews-only' industry. In American politics, the Zionists are taking over more and more departments of state.

"The neoconservatives are the greatest threat America has ever faced, and they control the Office of the President, the Office of the Vice President, the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the police-state apparatus known as "Homeland Security." (Paul Craig Roberts 'Outfoxed by bin Laden'.

The chances of a Muslim or an Arab person getting a job in an American administration are virtually zero. If current trends continue then we are headed for a 'Jews-only' American state where the only non-Jews permitted will be Shabbat goys who support everything done by Ariel Sharon.

It might be argued that the above criticisms of the Jews-only state, with its Jews-only laws, Jews-only rights, Jews-only cemeteries, Jews-only property ownership, Jews-only roads running between Jews-only settlements/towns/cities, Jews-only immigration, Jews-only employment, Jews-only marriages, Jews-only religion, Jews-only international laws, Jews-only taboos, openly racist Jewish politicians, etc. might have some merit but this is ruined by the use of the word Jew which suggests such criticisms are at the very least anti-Semitic if not racist. Kathleen and bill Christison avoid any charge of anti-Semitism or racism by talking about "Israeli-only settlements, Israeli-only roads" (Kathleen and Bill Christison 'On Israel/Palestine An Exchange with Bennie Morris'.

But, as has been suggested above, this is not technically correct. Although Palestinian- Israelis are theoretically allowed to travel on these roads, in practice this is not possible because the roads link one Jews-only settlement/town/city to another. It is much more accurate to say that they are Jews-only roads running between Jews-only settlements.

But surely, it might be argued, the use of the phrase "Jews-only" is wrong since it condemns all Jewish people around the world for what is being done in their name by the Zionist state in Palestine.

Aren't these "Jews-only" criticisms blatantly wrong because they have got nothing to do with Jews around the world? With some notable exceptions on what is regarded as the political extremes, no mainstream Jewish organization anywhere around the world has demanded that the Zionist state abides by UN resolutions, or that it gives up its weapons of mass destruction in the same way as these organizations demanded such things of Saddam. No criticisms have been made of the Zionist state's Jews-only immigration or Jews-only settlements or Jews-only marriages or Jews-only property.

In other words, virtually all Jews around the world support the Jews-only nature of the Zionist state in Palestine and the Zionist state's flouting of international law.

Kathleen Christison paints an accurate picture of the nature of the Jewish support for the Zionist state. She starts off by talking about the views of the Jewish historian Benny Morris. "This was a day or two after this paragon of dispassionate Israeli scholarship had expostulated in an interview published in Ha'aretz on the benefits (if you're Jewish) of ethnic cleansing, the critical miscalculation of David Ben-Gurion in not having completed the total ethnic cleansing of Palestine from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River in 1948 when he had a chance, and the barbarity of Arab and Muslim culture.

"The Arab world as it is today is barbarian," Morris declared. Islamic and Arab culture is "a world in which human life doesn't have the same value as it does in the West," in which freedom and democracy are alien, in which there are "no moral inhibitions." He was speaking in sweeping terms, of entire cultures, of the mass of individuals in the Arab and the Muslim worlds, not merely of governments that are oppressive or undemocratic. Palestinians in particular, Morris believes, are barbaric, "a very sick society," and should be treated "the way we treat individuals who are serial killers. . . . Something like a cage has to be built for them." (Kathleen Christison 'American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel'.

Morris's comments are blatantly anti-Palestinian and racist, and yet he regards himself as still being a leftist. If leftist Jews can hold such views then just imagine the views of those on the right of the political spectrum. Christison concludes, "Benny Morris - who still considers himself a leftist, still favors establishment of a Palestinian state in part of Palestine, still exposes Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians in his examination of early Israeli history - is one of those people Meir Keohane was describing, and he speaks for large numbers of his fellow Israelis and his fellow Jews throughout the world. Morris's blunt soul-bearing has lifted the last barrier of propriety to the open expression of raw Arab hatred. One longs for some gigantic outcry of opposition or disgust over this confession of deep bigotry, but there has been none.

Except for a few letters to the editor of Ha'aretz from American Jews, the interview has aroused little attention in the Jewish-American community: no denunciation, no shock, little or no discussion on any but the most progressive Jewish e-mail lists. You have to assume that, however awkward Morris's blunt language may be, he is speaking for a large segment of American Jews who say they oppose the occupation, say they hate Sharon, say they hate Israel's oppression of the Palestinians, but who do nothing about any of these things and who in the end would not grieve, either for the Palestinians or for the Jewish soul, if Israel wiped the Palestinians off the map." (Kathleen Christison 'American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel'.

Michael Neumann reaches similar conclusions to Christison but from a philosophical standpoint, "Do we want to say it is antisemitic to accuse, not just the Israelis, but Jews generally of complicity in these crimes against humanity? Again, maybe not, because there is a quite reasonable case for such assertions. Compare them, for example, to the claim that Germans generally were complicit in such crimes. This never meant that every last German, man, woman, idiot and child, were guilty. It meant that most Germans were.

Their guilt, of course, did not consist in shoving naked prisoners into gas chambers. It consisted in support for the people who planned such acts, or - as many overwrought, moralistic Jewish texts will tell you - for denying the horror unfolding around them, for failing to speak out and resist, for passive consent. Note that the extreme danger of any kind of active resistance is not supposed to be an excuse here. Well, virtually no Jew is in any kind of danger from speaking out. And speaking out is the only sort of resistance required. If many Jews spoke out, it would have an enormous effect.

But the overwhelming majority of Jews do not, and in the vast majority of cases, this is because they support Israel. Now perhaps the whole notion of collective responsibility should be discarded; perhaps some clever person will convince us that we have to do this. But at present, the case for Jewish complicity seems much stronger than the case for German complicity. So if it is not racist, and reasonable, to say that the Germans were complicit in crimes against humanity, then it is not racist, and reasonable, to say the same of the Jews.

And should the notion of collective responsibility be discarded, it would still be reasonable to say that many, perhaps most adult Jewish individuals support a state that commits war crimes, because that's just true. So if saying these things is antisemitic, than it can be reasonable to be anti-Semitic. In short, the real scandal today is not anti-Semitism but the importance it is given. Israel has committed war crimes. It has implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have hastened to implicate themselves.

This has provoked hatred against Jews. Why not? Some of this hatred is racist, some isn't, but who cares? Why should we pay any attention to this issue at all?" (Michael Neumann 'What is Anti-Semitism?'

The jews-only policies outlined above are the manifestations of the perennial Jewish belief in their chosenness, their superiority over all other races on Earth. As Hannah ardent once argued, "If you do not dissent then you consent.

None of the information within this site is copyrighted.
feel free to copy and distribute to the white public.
For more info:

ARYAN NATIONS EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH